Kevin Lindke — The Client

Identity

FieldDetailSource
Full NameKevin LindkeCourt records
LocationSt. Clair County, MichiganCourt records
Facebook Group“Through My Eyes” — ~21,000 membersTimes Herald
AttorneyPhilip L. Ellison, Outside Legal Counsel PLCPACER, Saginaw County docket
Supreme Court CaseLindke v. Freed — social media/First AmendmentSCOTUS

Criminal History

Conviction: Using Computers to Commit a Crime

EventDetailSource
Oct 2020 – Feb 2021Posted the phone numbers of two women — Ami Miner (mother of his daughter) and Renee Burkhart (Miner’s mother) — to “Through My Eyes” Facebook pageTimes Herald, Nov 29, 2021
ResultBoth women received harassing and threatening messages from strangers who found their numbers on the pageSame
ChargesAttempted assault/resisting/obstructing a police officer; using computers to commit a crime (both one-year misdemeanors)Same
PleaGuilty to both countsSame
Sentence272 days in jail (credit for time served)Same
Dismissed countsAssaulting/resisting/obstructing an officer; breaking and entering — illegal entry; unlawful posting of a message; additional computer crime countSame
JudgeHon. Dan Damman, St. Clair County Circuit CourtSame
Judge’s commentCase is “a byproduct of [Lindke’s] long history of litigation with the victims”Same

Aggravated Stalking Charges

EventDetailSource
Aug 2020Posted PPO petition — including personal contact information for Miner — to “Through My Eyes”Times Herald, Mar 24, 2021
ResultMiner “belittled by followers of the page”; Burkhart’s phone number posted onlineSame
Bound overJudge John Monaghan found two specific posts “were clearly designed to encourage his followers to harass the victims”Same
Aggravated stalkingBound over on aggravated stalking + unlawful posting + computer crimeSame

PPO Violations and Contempt

EventDetailSource
PPOs obtainedFrom multiple counties — including Macomb County (Judge Rancilio)Clutch Justice
105 daysServed in St. Clair County for contempt during PPO violation arraignmentSame
March 3, 2021Arrested on warrants including three counts each for failure to appear and contemptTimes Herald

The “Through My Eyes” Platform

“Through My Eyes” is a Facebook group with approximately 21,000 members at its peak. Lindke used it to:

  1. Post victims’ phone numbers — leading to harassing calls from strangers
  2. Post PPO petitions with personal contact information
  3. Coordinate follow-up harassment — Judge Monaghan found posts were “clearly designed to encourage his followers to harass the victims”
  4. Make false accusations — accused Miner of allowing their daughter contact with a convicted sex offender (court found accusations “were false and [he] knew them to be false”)
  5. Target followers against specific people — City Manager James Freed was targeted; Freed testified Lindke “harassed people, lots of PPOs”

Philip L. Ellison has been a member of Through My Eyes since July 6, 2020 — the same group Lindke used for the conduct that resulted in criminal conviction.

Source: Clutch Justice, May 11, 2026


The SLAPP Suit Connection

Ellison filed the SLAPP suit (25-2441-CZ) against Rita Williams two months after she published reporting about Lindke’s documented conduct toward her and her family:

Documented Conduct Toward Rita WilliamsSource
Registered internet domains in Rita’s name AND her minor daughter’s nameDomain Registration Campaign
Death threats, doxxing, posting children’s photographs to 21,000-member networkClutch Justice
7 AM Saturday phone call: “I will make you and your children homeless”Same
NCMEC CyberTipline report filed Nov 18, 2025 (referred to Michigan ICAC Task Force)Same
Process servers sent to Rita’s home after dark, multiple nights, broadcast as entertainmentSame
False police reports filed by Lindke’s network members against RitaSame

At the August 3, 2026 hearing before Judge Gafkay, Ellison stated on the record that his client asked him for filings and records about Rita, that his client “was interested,” and that he was “very positive” the same client created the domains targeting Rita and her minor child.

Source: Clutch Justice, Aug 3, 2026


The Federal Cases

Lindke v. Freed (US Supreme Court)

Lindke sued Port Huron City Manager James Freed after Freed deleted Lindke’s comments from his personal Facebook page and blocked him. The case went to the U.S. Supreme Court on the question of when a public official’s social media page becomes a public forum.

The Supreme Court ruled in Lindke’s favor — holding that a public official’s social media page can be a public forum subject to First Amendment protections. This is a legitimately important First Amendment decision.

The irony: The same person who won a Supreme Court case about being blocked on social media was convicted of using social media to coordinate harassment. He fought for the right to comment on a public official’s page while using his own page to post victims’ phone numbers.

Lindke v. King (Federal PPO challenge)

Ellison filed federal § 1983 challenges to the PPO statute on Lindke’s behalf. Ellison withdrew from these cases on April 23, 2026 — the same day Lindke was booked in St. Clair County. The case was dismissed with prejudice on May 6, 2026.


The Financial Architecture

Per Clutch Justice, May 11, 2026:

The federal PPO challenges pursued § 1983 claims that could generate § 1988 attorney’s fees for Ellison if successful. The SLAPP suit silences the journalist who documented the conduct underlying the PPOs → which undermines the PPOs → which supports the federal challenge → which generates fees.

The structure collapsed when Ellison withdrew and the federal case was dismissed with prejudice.


Cross-Reference


Sources

🔬 Share What You Know

Every observation strengthens the network. Tag what you see, share what you know, build immunity together.

📡

Signal

Private

Submit observations directly to the network. Reviewed before publication. Your IP is hashed, never stored raw.

Min 10 characters. No personal data stored without consent.
Only used if we need to verify. Never published.
💬

Discuss

Public

Open discussion on the membrane. Comments live on sovereign infrastructure.

↗ also on GitHub Discussions

🔐

Secure Message

Encrypted

Send a message directly on the membrane. IP hashed, never stored raw. For end-to-end encryption, use the external email option below.

Only used if we need to respond. Never published.
↗ prefer external email? ProtonMail Clutch Justice

💡 Tip: If you are a government employee or officer of the court, consider using a personal email account for sensitive disclosures.