The Enforcement Ecosystem — Who Is Supposed to Be Doing This?

The Question

Who has the mandate, the evidence, and the authority to act — and what did they do with it?

This is not an investigation of the network. This is an investigation of the investigators. Every body below has statutory or court-rule authority over some piece of the documented misconduct. Not one of them has the full picture.


Ten Bodies. One Complaint. Two Letters.

On October 7, 2026, : Clutch Justice documented the exact moment the enforcement gap becomes visible :

A Michigan resident filed a UPL complaint on August 31. On September 30, the State Bar closed the file — “did not meet the standards set by the UPL Committee.” The standards were not identified. On October 1, the AGC returned the filing — Banks “is not a listed attorney.” That is the fact that makes the conduct a violation. The remedy offered: a State Bar complaint form, for the office that closed the file the afternoon before.

Two letters. One day apart. Each pointing at the other office.

Put the letters in date order and the problem explains itself.


The Map

1. State Bar of Michigan — UPL Department

Jurisdiction: Unauthorized practice of law by non-lawyers (Rule 16, Supreme Court Rules) Authority: Investigate, recommend prosecution to Board of Commissioners, issue subpoenas

Evidence available:

What happened: File No. 26-UP-51 was administratively closed September 30, 2026. The closure letter says the matter “did not meet the standards set by the UPL Committee.” The standards are not published. The letter does not say what the investigation consisted of or whether anyone reviewed the police report.

MCL 600.916 has three prohibitions. The third — “shall not in any manner whatsoever represent or designate himself as an attorney” — requires no client, no legal advice, no fee. Telling police officers you are an attorney, and watching them escort a father off school property on that representation, is the conduct the statute was written to prevent.


2. Attorney Grievance Commission (AGC)

Grievance Administrator: Michael V. Goetz (appointed Sep 2019) Deputy Administrator: Kimberly L. Uhuru Asst Deputy Administrator: Cynthia C. Bullington (at AGC since 1982 — 44 years) Jurisdiction: Attorney misconduct — licensed attorneys only Staff: 13 attorneys, 3 investigators

Evidence available:

What happened: The AGC returned the Banks UPL filing on October 1. Cynthia Bullington’s letter notes Banks is not a listed attorney and encloses a State Bar complaint form.

The gap: The supplemental complaint also addressed licensed attorneys (Moreland, Meihn, Hall). The return letter addresses only Banks. It is silent on the licensed attorneys who ARE within AGC jurisdiction.

As documented in the Institutional Immunity Pattern, the AGC’s own annual reports show:


3. Attorney Discipline Board (ADB)

Chair: Peter A. Smit (Oct 2026 – Sep 2027) Executive Director: Wendy A. Neeley Function: Adjudicates attorney discipline cases prosecuted by the AGC

The structural problem: Jehan Crump-Gibson is an ADB Hearing Panelist (appointed May 2017). Hearing panelists sit on three-member panels that conduct evidentiary hearings in attorney discipline cases.

Crump-Gibson simultaneously:

The ADB processes what the AGC sends it. If the AGC doesn’t prosecute, the ADB has nothing to adjudicate. The system depends on the AGC acting.


4. Judicial Tenure Commission (JTC)

Interim Executive Director: Glenn J. Page (returned from retirement Feb 1, 2026) Commission Chair: Thomas J. Ryan, Esq. Staff: 15 positions (13 attorneys, 2 admin) — for all judicial oversight in the State of Michigan Phone: (313) 875-5110

Evidence available: Five Wayne County judges with documented connections to the Banks network:

What happened: The JTC acknowledged five Requests for Investigation on September 24, 2026, and assigned them to staff for review.

What happened next (October 12, 2026): When the same complainant sent an email to 88 institutional recipients — including the JTC — with full evidence links and the 88-person CC line visible, the JTC responded in 23 minutes with a boilerplate: “As you were advised in an email response sent to you on September 21 of this year, the Commission cannot take any action in response to an email message.”

The JTC has five open RFIs from this complainant. Staff were assigned. The investigations are pending. Yet the JTC’s October 12 response treats the complainant as if they are a stranger emailing general questions.

Compare: Nikki Snyder — a State Board of Education member on the same CC line — responded in 13 minutes with her personal cell phone number. Same evidence. Same email. One institution gave a personal phone number. The other gave a form letter pretending it had never heard of the complainant.

The JTC is not refusing to investigate. The formal complaints are on file. The JTC is refusing to acknowledge, in a reply-all to 88 recipients, that it has open investigations. This is how the Institutional Immunity Pattern operates in real time: process the complaint through the confidential channel, perform the boilerplate on the public channel.

The gap:

The same JTC pattern documented in Cross-Subgraph Patterns: Schipper (Barry County) investigation acknowledged, Galen (Eastpointe) confidentially admonished. Different counties, same processing mode.


5. LARA — Corporations Division

LARA Director: Dr. Marlon I. Brown (appointed Feb 2024) Corporations Division Director: Alexis Lupo

Evidence available:

What happened: Automated “Not Good” standing for non-filing. Eventual dissolution for persistent failure.

The gap: LARA’s Corporations Division “promotes economic development and growth by facilitating the formation of business entities.” Their mandate is facilitation, not oversight. Entity formation is ministerial — if the paperwork is correct, it gets filed. There is no mechanism to cross-reference criminal records against entity officer filings. No mechanism to flag entities where every officer is a convicted felon.


6. Attorney General — Charitable Trust Section

AG: Dana Nessel Contact: ct_email@michigan.gov Jurisdiction: Charitable organization oversight under MCL 400.271 and MCL 14.251

Evidence available:

What the AG’s office CAN do: The AG just charged Fay Beydoun with 16 felonies for $20M grant abuse at Global Link International. Filed a complaint against Chosen Kingdom Builders for nonprofit governance and fiduciary-duty failures. The AG’s office actively prosecutes nonprofit fraud.

What happened here: No public record of action against any Banks network entity.

Purpose Foundation: two convicted felons, [data pending] revenue school, 3% math proficiency, 72.67% of revenue extracted by management company. Global Link: $20M grant, prosecution. The scale is different. The pattern — felon-controlled entity, government funding, inadequate governance — is identical.


7. DPSCD — Office of Charter Schools

Superintendent: Dr. Nikolai Vitti Director of Charter Schools: Kisha Verdusco (since February 2013 — 13 years) Jurisdiction: Charter authorization and oversight under MCL 380.502(4) and 380.507

MCL 380.507(1)(d): “Oversee each public school academy operating under a contract issued by the authorizing body. The oversight must be sufficient to ensure that the board of directors is in compliance with the terms of the contract and with applicable law.”

What happened: PCA was authorized in July 2025 despite the operator’s bottom- 3% academic record at MacDowell ( 3% math proficiency, statewide rank 1,443/1,488).

DPSCD recently declined to reauthorize Barack Obama Leadership Academy (BOLA). Superintendent Vitti publicly explained that decision by citing “contractual compliance, academic outcomes, and fiscal stewardship.” Those same criteria apply to Banks’ schools. Different outcome.

PCA’s board includes:

These are DPSCD appointees. Under MCL 380.507, authorizers appoint board members who swear constitutional oaths.


8. Michigan Department of Education

What happened: MDE investigated Banks in February 2022 for having no teaching credential. Application #590606, status: HOLD. Banks continues to operate as superintendent of two schools.

The investigation letter went to Board President Wells-Stallworth. The response: Banks applied for an administrative permit. It was placed on HOLD. No credential has been issued. Banks has continued as superintendent for four years after the investigation.


9. Wayne County Prosecutor

Prosecutor: Kym Worthy

MCL 600.916 makes unauthorized practice of law contempt of the circuit court in the county where it happened. Purpose Charter Academy is in Wayne County. Banks told Wayne County police officers he was an attorney. The complainant asked both the State Bar and AGC to coordinate with the Wayne County Prosecutor. Neither letter mentions doing so.

Worthy herself alleged Judge Miller “displayed a bias” in an infant murder case (WXYZ, 2024). But broader enforcement on the Banks network: no public record of action.


10. Michigan Supreme Court

The Supreme Court:

The enforcement system is their creation. When the State Bar closes a holding-out case and the AGC sends it back, the Supreme Court’s system produced that outcome. That is not a bug. It is an architectural gap.


The Pattern

BodyHad Evidence?Acted?Result
State Bar UPL✓Closed fileStandards cited, not published
AGC✓Returned re: BanksSilent on licensed attorneys
ADB—Awaiting AGCHearing panelist = defense attorney
JTC✓Acknowledged 5No proceeding. No permanent ED.
LARA✓Automated statusFiling office by design
AG Charitable TrustAvailableNo actionActive on $20M grant fraud elsewhere
DPSCD Charter✓Authorized PCADeclined BOLA under same criteria
MDE✓HOLD on permitNo enforcement beyond letter
Wayne Co Prosecutor✓No actionCoordination requested, not documented
MI Supreme CourtBuilt the system—Declined to define UPL in 2014

Every body exercises authority up to its jurisdictional edge and stops. The edges don’t overlap. They gap.


What This Is Not

This is not an allegation of corruption. The Grievance Administrator is following his jurisdiction. The AGC correctly identified that a non-lawyer is outside its scope. The JTC assigned investigations to staff. LARA processes filings. Each body is doing what its mandate says.

The problem is that each mandate was written to handle one actor at a time. The Banks network operates across every mandate simultaneously. An operator who is not a lawyer (State Bar), whose attorneys may have conflicts (AGC), whose board includes judges (JTC), whose entities are controlled by felons (LARA), whose nonprofits hold charitable assets (AG), whose schools are authorized by public bodies (DPSCD), and whose credentials were investigated and left unresolved (MDE). No single body sees the whole pattern. The pattern lives in the gaps.


Connected Analysis

On this site:

On detroit.primals.eco:

Independent reporting:


Verify Everything

ClaimSourceHow to Check
State Bar closed File 26-UP-51Clutch Justice (Oct 7, 2026)Published letter
AGC returned filing Oct 1Clutch Justice (Oct 7, 2026)Published letter
Bullington at AGC since 1982agcmi.org/about-us/our-teamTeam page
JTC interim director since Feb 2026jtc.courts.mi.gov/the_staffStaff page
No permanent JTC ED (apps closed Jul 13)jtc.courts.mi.govNews page
AGC 88.8% dismissal rate (2024)AGC 2024 Annual Reportagcmi.org/documents
MCL 600.916 three prohibitionslegislature.mi.govMCL 600.916(1)
Verdusco at DPSCD since Feb 2013LinkedInProfile
AG charged Beydoun (16 felonies)FOX 2 DetroitPublished report
DPSCD declined BOLAdetroitk12.orgSuperintendent message
ADB members 2026-27adbmich.org/about-us/adb-membersBoard page
Goetz appointment Sep 2019agcmi.org/aboutAbout page

The enforcement system is not broken. It is fragmented. Each body does exactly what its mandate says. The network operates in the space where no mandate reaches. The complainant did everything right. The system produced two letters, one day apart, each pointing at the other door.

🔬 Share What You Know

Every observation strengthens the network. Tag what you see, share what you know, build immunity together.

📡

Signal

Private

Submit observations directly to the network. Reviewed before publication. Your IP is hashed, never stored raw.

Min 10 characters. No personal data stored without consent.
Only used if we need to verify. Never published.
💬

Discuss

Public

Open discussion on the membrane. Comments live on sovereign infrastructure.

↗ also on GitHub Discussions

🔐

Secure Message

Encrypted

Send a message directly on the membrane. IP hashed, never stored raw. For end-to-end encryption, use the external email option below.

Only used if we need to respond. Never published.
↗ prefer external email? ProtonMail Clutch Justice

💡 Tip: If you are a government employee or officer of the court, consider using a personal email account for sensitive disclosures.